Geotechnical Engineering Formula Sheet
All key formulas for university exams — index properties, compaction, permeability, consolidation, shear strength, bearing capacity, earth pressure, slope stability, and pile foundations
Last Updated: March 2026
How to Use This Sheet
- All formulas follow IS codes and standard geotechnical practice unless noted otherwise.
- Symbol conventions: γ = unit weight (kN/m³); σ = total stress; σ′ = effective stress; u = pore water pressure; all in kPa unless stated.
- Water unit weight γw = 9.81 kN/m³ (use 10 kN/m³ only if problem states so).
- Key values are highlighted in the Quick Reference Table at the end.
- Use this sheet alongside individual topic pages for derivations and worked examples.
1. Index Properties & Phase Relationships
1.1 Volume Ratios
Void ratio: e = Vv / Vs
Porosity: n = Vv / V = e / (1+e)
e = n / (1−n)
Degree of saturation: S = Vw / Vv (as decimal; S = 1 for saturated)
Air voids ratio: av = Va / V = n(1−S)
1.2 Water Content & Specific Gravity
Water content: w = Mw / Ms (decimal; multiply by 100 for %)
Specific gravity: Gs = ρs / ρw
Fundamental relation: S e = w Gs
For saturated soil (S = 1): e = w Gs
1.3 Unit Weights
Bulk: γ = (Gs + Se) γw / (1+e)
Dry: γd = Gs γw / (1+e) = γ / (1+w)
Saturated: γsat = (Gs+e) γw / (1+e)
Submerged: γ′ = γsat − γw = (Gs−1) γw / (1+e)
1.4 Relative Density
Dr = (emax − e) / (emax − emin) × 100 %
States: Very loose < 15 % < Loose < 35 % < Medium < 65 % < Dense < 85 % < Very dense
2. Atterberg Limits & Derived Indices
Plasticity index: PI = LL − PL
Liquidity index: LI = (w − PL) / PI
Consistency index: CI = (LL − w) / PI = 1 − LI
Toughness index: IT = PI / IF (IF = flow index from Casagrande test)
Activity: A = PI / (% clay fraction, particles < 2 μm)
Tension crack depth: zc = 2cu / γ (for φu = 0)
Critical height of vertical cut: Hc = 4cu / γ = 2 zc
Skempton’s empirical: Cc = 0.009 (LL − 10) for undisturbed NC clay
2.1 Plasticity Chart — A-line and Classification
A-line: PI = 0.73 (LL − 20)
U-line (upper boundary): PI = 0.9 (LL − 8)
LL < 50 % → Low plasticity (L); LL ≥ 50 % → High plasticity (H)
Above A-line → Clay (C); Below A-line → Silt/Organic (M or O)
CL: above A-line, LL < 50 %, PI ≥ 7 | CH: above A-line, LL ≥ 50 %
ML: below A-line, LL < 50 % | MH: below A-line, LL ≥ 50 %
3. Soil Classification — IS 1498 (USCS)
Primary split: > 50 % passing 75 μm → Fine-grained; ≥ 50 % retained → Coarse-grained
G vs S: ≥ 50 % of coarse fraction retained on 4.75 mm → Gravel (G); else Sand (S)
Well-graded criteria:
GW: Cu ≥ 4 AND 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3
SW: Cu ≥ 6 AND 1 ≤ Cc ≤ 3
Cu = D60/D10; Cc = D30²/(D10 × D60)
Hazen’s formula: k = C × D10² (k in cm/s; D10 in mm; C = 100 for uniform sand)
Organic criterion: LLoven-dried/LL < 0.75 → OL or OH
4. Soil Compaction
γd = γ / (1+w)
ZAV line (S=100%): γd,ZAV = Gs γw / (1 + wGs)
Degree of compaction: DC = (γd,field / γd,max,Proctor) × 100 %
Compaction energy: E = (W × H × Nb × NL) / V
Standard Proctor: 2.6 kg rammer, 310 mm drop, 3 layers, 25 blows = 605 kJ/m³
Modified Proctor: 4.9 kg rammer, 450 mm drop, 5 layers, 25 blows = 2726 kJ/m³
Higher energy → higher MDD, lower OMC (curve shifts up and left)
5. Permeability & Seepage
Darcy’s Law: v = k i; Q = k i A; vs = v/n (seepage velocity)
Hydraulic gradient: i = Δh / L
Constant head: k = QL / (Aht)
Falling head: k = (aL/At) ln(h1/h2) = 2.303(aL/At) log(h1/h2)
Stratified — parallel flow: kH = (k1H1 + k2H2 + …) / H
Stratified — perpendicular flow: kV = H / (H1/k1 + H2/k2 + …)
Always: kH ≥ kV
Critical gradient (quicksand): icr = (Gs−1)/(1+e) = γ′/γw
Seepage flow net: q = kH(Nf/Nd) per unit length
Exit gradient: ie = Δh/l (last square); FOS = icr/ie ≥ 3–5
Anisotropic: transform x′ = x√(kz/kx); keff = √(kxkz)
Seepage force per unit volume: j = i γw
6. Consolidation & Settlement
Effective stress principle: σ′ = σ − u
Terzaghi’s equation: ∂ue/∂t = cv ∂²ue/∂z²
cv = k / (γw mv); mv = av/(1+eo)
Time factor: Tv = cv t / Hdr²
Hdr = H/2 (double drainage); Hdr = H (single drainage)
Degree of consolidation U:
U ≤ 60 %: Tv = (π/4)(U/100)²
U > 60 %: Tv = 1.781 − 0.933 log(100−U%)
| U (%) | Tv | U (%) | Tv |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 0.008 | 60 | 0.287 |
| 20 | 0.031 | 70 | 0.403 |
| 30 | 0.071 | 80 | 0.567 |
| 40 | 0.126 | 90 | 0.848 |
| 50 | 0.197 | 95 | 1.129 |
Settlement — NC clay: Sc = [CcH/(1+eo)] log[(σo′+Δσ)/σo′]
Settlement — OC clay (if final stress ≤ σc′): use Cs instead of Cc
Settlement — OC clay (if final stress > σc′): two-stage (Cs then Cc)
Alternative: Sc = mv Δσ H
OCR = σc′ / σo′
Secondary: Ss = Cα H log(t2/t1)
cv from Taylor’s method: cv = 0.848 Hdr² / t90
cv from Casagrande’s method: cv = 0.197 Hdr² / t50
7. Shear Strength
Mohr-Coulomb: τf = c′ + σ′ tanφ′ (effective); τf = cu for φu=0 (undrained saturated)
Failure plane angle: αf = 45° + φ′/2 (to major principal plane)
Principal stress at failure: σ1′ = σ3′ Nφ + 2c′√Nφ
Nφ = tan²(45° + φ′/2)
Mohr circle: centre = (σ1+σ3)/2; radius = (σ1−σ3)/2
UCT: cu = qu/2 (unconfined compressive strength divided by 2)
Pore pressure: Δu = B[Δσ3 + A(Δσ1−Δσ3)]; B=1 for saturated soil
Sensitivity: St = cu,undisturbed / cu,remoulded
Vane shear: cu = T / [π D²H/2 (1 + D/3H)] ≈ T/(3.66D³) for H=2D
CD test → c′, φ′ (drained); CU test → c′, φ′ and ccu, φcu; UU test → cu, φu=0
8. Bearing Capacity
Terzaghi strip: qu = c Nc + q Nq + 0.5 γ B Nγ
Square: qu = 1.3c Nc + q Nq + 0.4γB Nγ
Circular: qu = 1.3c Nc + q Nq + 0.3γB Nγ
q = γ Df (overburden at foundation level)
Net ultimate: qnet,u = qu − q = cNc + q(Nq−1) + 0.5γBNγ
Net safe: qns = qnet,u / FOS (FOS = 3 general; 2.5 local shear)
For φ = 0 (undrained): qnet,u = 5.14 cu (strip); 6.68 cu (square)
| φ° | Nc | Nq | Nγ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 5.14 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| 10 | 8.35 | 2.47 | 1.22 |
| 20 | 14.83 | 6.40 | 5.39 |
| 25 | 20.72 | 10.66 | 10.88 |
| 30 | 30.14 | 18.40 | 22.40 |
| 35 | 46.12 | 33.30 | 48.03 |
| 40 | 75.31 | 64.20 | 109.41 |
IS 6403: qu = cNcscdcic + qNqsqdqiq + 0.5γBNγsγdγiγ
Water table at foundation level: replace γ in Nγ-term with γ′
Water table at surface: replace γ in both q-term and Nγ-term with γ′
9. Earth Pressure
At-rest: K0 = 1 − sinφ′ (Jaky, NC soil); K0,OC = K0,NC × OCR0.5
Rankine active: Ka = (1−sinφ)/(1+sinφ) = tan²(45°−φ/2)
Rankine passive: Kp = (1+sinφ)/(1−sinφ) = tan²(45°+φ/2) = 1/Ka
Active pressure at depth z (c-φ soil): σa = Kaγz − 2c√Ka
Passive pressure: σp = Kpγz + 2c√Kp
Total active force (cohesionless, level backfill): Pa = ½KaγH² at H/3 from base
With surcharge q: Psurcharge = KaqH at H/2 from base
Tension crack depth: zc = 2c/(γ√Ka)
Critical height: Hc = 4c/(γ√Ka) = 2zc
Below WT: add hydrostatic pressure u = γw(z−zw) separately to effective earth pressure
10. Slope Stability
FOS = resisting moment / driving moment = Σ(c′l + N′tanφ′) / ΣW sinα (Fellenius)
N′ = W cosα − ul (pore pressure correction)
Bishop simplified: FOS = Σ[(c′b+(W−ub)tanφ′)/mα] / ΣWsinα (iterative)
mα = cosα + (tanφ′sinα)/FOS
Infinite slope (dry cohesionless): FOS = tanφ′ / tanβ
Infinite slope (saturated, seepage parallel to slope): FOS = (γ′/γsat)(tanφ′/tanβ)
Taylor stability: FOS = c / (γH Sn); Sn from chart
Critical height (φ=0, vertical cut): Hc = 4cu/γ
Pore pressure ratio: ru = u/(γz)
11. Pile Foundations
Ultimate capacity: Qu = Qs + Qb
Skin friction — clay (α method): fs = α cu; Qs = α cu π D L
Skin friction — sand (β method): fs = K σv′ tanδ
End bearing in clay: Qb = 9 cu Ab (deep pile, L/D ≥ 4)
End bearing in sand: Qb = σv,crit′ Nq Ab (capped at 5 MPa)
Safe capacity: Qsafe = Qu/FOS (FOS = 2.5 with load test; 3.0 from formula)
ENR formula: Qu = Whh/(s+C)
Group efficiency: η = Qgroup/(n Qindividual)
Block failure: Qblock = cu × perimeter × L + 9cu,base × Ablock
Group capacity = min(n Qindividual, Qblock)
NSF: Qn = α cu π D Hc; total load = structural + NSF ≤ Qsafe
Minimum pile spacing (driven): 3D or 1.0 m (IS 2911)
12. Quick-Reference Table
| Item | Value / Formula |
|---|---|
| Fundamental relation | Se = wGs |
| Dry unit weight from bulk | γd = γ/(1+w) |
| e–n relationship | n = e/(1+e); e = n/(1–n) |
| ZAV line | γd = Gsγw/(1+wGs) |
| Standard Proctor energy | 605 kJ/m³; Modified: 2726 kJ/m³ |
| Critical hydraulic gradient | icr = (Gs–1)/(1+e) ≈ 1.0 for most sands |
| Flow net seepage | q = kH(Nf/Nd) |
| Tv for U = 50 % | 0.197 |
| Tv for U = 90 % | 0.848 |
| cv from oedometer (Taylor) | cv = 0.848 Hdr²/t90 |
| Time ratio (single vs double drainage) | tsingle = 4 × tdouble (for same U) |
| Failure plane angle | αf = 45° + φ/2 |
| φu for saturated clay (UU) | φu = 0; τf = cu |
| Ka for φ = 30° | 0.333 |
| Kp for φ = 30° | 3.00 |
| Ka × Kp | = 1 always (Rankine) |
| Jaky’s K0 | K0 = 1 – sinφ′ |
| Active force (cohesionless) | Pa = ½KaγH² at H/3 |
| Tension crack depth | zc = 2cu/γ |
| qnet,u for φ=0 strip | 5.14 cu |
| qnet,u for φ=0 square | 1.3×5.14×cu = 6.68 cu |
| FOS for bearing capacity | 3.0 (general shear); 2.5 (local shear) |
| End bearing in deep clay pile | Qb = 9 cu Ab |
| FOS for pile (with load test) | 2.5; without test: 3.0 |
| Infinite slope (dry) FOS | tanφ/tanβ |
| Infinite slope (saturated) FOS | (γ′/γsat) tanφ/tanβ |
| Critical height vertical cut (φ=0) | Hc = 4cu/γ |
13. Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Using w as a Percentage Instead of a Decimal in Phase Relationship Formulas
What happens: w = 20 % is substituted as 20 in Se = wGs, giving Se = 20Gs instead of the correct 0.20Gs. This produces void ratios that are unrealistically large.
Fix: In all phase relationship and unit weight formulas, w must be a decimal fraction (20 % → 0.20). Only report the final answer in percentage form.
Mistake 2: Applying Double Drainage Hdr = H/2 to a Singly Drained Layer
What happens: Hdr = H/2 is used for a clay layer that drains only at the top (e.g., overlying rock or very stiff impermeable clay below). This underestimates consolidation time by a factor of 4.
Fix: Carefully identify drainage boundaries: permeable layer above AND below → double drainage (Hdr = H/2). Permeable on one side only → single drainage (Hdr = H).
Mistake 3: Using Nc = 5.14 for Pile Tip in Clay (Should be 9)
Fix: Shallow foundation bearing capacity (Terzaghi, φ=0): Nc = 5.14. Deep pile tip in clay (IS 2911): Nc = 9. These are different conditions — confined failure at depth gives higher Nc.
Mistake 4: Forgetting to Subtract Overburden When Computing Net Bearing Capacity
Fix: qnet,u = qu − q (where q = γDf). The factor of safety is applied to qnet,u, not qu. Using qs = qu/FOS underestimates the safe bearing capacity.
Mistake 5: Using Total Stress Active Pressure When Water Table is Present
Fix: Below the water table: horizontal pressure = effective earth pressure (Kaγ′z contribution) + hydrostatic pressure (γw(z−zw)). Calculate separately and add — never use Kaγsatz as the total horizontal pressure.
14. Frequently Asked Questions
Q2. How is the effective stress principle applied in every geotechnical calculation?
Terzaghi’s effective stress principle (σ′ = σ − u) is the thread running through all geotechnical analysis. In consolidation: settlement occurs because σ′ increases as excess pore pressure u dissipates. In shear strength: the Mohr-Coulomb criterion uses σ′ (effective normal stress on the failure plane). In bearing capacity: ultimate bearing capacity depends on c′, φ′ (effective stress strength parameters) in drained conditions. In earth pressure: the effective horizontal pressure Kaγ′z acts on the wall, while hydrostatic pressure u = γwz acts separately. In slope stability: Bishop’s method computes N′ = Wcosα − ul to get the effective normal force. Understanding where and why effective stress is used is more important than memorising individual formulas.
Q4. How do the geotechnical topics interconnect — what is the logical learning sequence?
The optimal sequence, reflecting the logical dependency chain, is: Index Properties (the vocabulary) → Atterberg Limits (consistency of clays) → Soil Classification (predicting behaviour from index tests) → Compaction (improving soil) → Permeability (flow through soil) → Seepage (2D flow, piping, uplift) → Consolidation (time-dependent settlement driven by pore pressure dissipation, governed by permeability) → Shear Strength (the Mohr-Coulomb criterion, tested in CD/CU/UU conditions) → Bearing Capacity (shallow foundations: applies shear strength to failure under footings) → Earth Pressure (lateral pressure on walls: applies Mohr-Coulomb to incipient failure of soil mass) → Slope Stability (applies shear strength to slope failure surfaces) → Pile Foundations (deep foundations: integrates shear strength along the pile shaft and at the tip). Each topic builds on the previous, so gaps in earlier concepts create compounding confusion in later ones.