Flow Measurement — Venturimeter, Orifice, Notches & Weirs | EngineeringHulk

Flow Measurement — Venturimeter, Orifice, Notches & Weirs

Devices and formulas for measuring flow rate in pipes and open channels — with discharge coefficients, derivations, and GATE CE worked examples

Last Updated: April 2026

Key Takeaways
  • All pipe flow meters (venturimeter, orifice meter, nozzle) use Bernoulli + continuity; actual discharge Q = Cd × Qtheoretical.
  • Venturimeter: Cd ≈ 0.96–0.99 (highest); Orifice meter: Cd ≈ 0.61–0.65; Flow nozzle: Cd ≈ 0.95–0.99.
  • Rectangular notch: Q = (2/3) Cd L √(2g) H3/2 — discharge proportional to H3/2.
  • Triangular (V-notch): Q = (8/15) Cd tan(θ/2) √(2g) H5/2 — more sensitive at low flows; discharge proportional to H5/2.
  • Trapezoidal notch (Cipolletti weir): combines rectangular and triangular formulas; side slopes 1H:4V eliminate end contraction correction.
  • Broad-crested weir: Q = 1.705 Cd L H3/2 — widely used for irrigation canal discharge measurement.
  • End contractions reduce effective length for rectangular notches: Leff = L – 0.1nH (Francis correction), where n = number of end contractions (1 or 2).

1. Classification of Flow Measurement Devices

CategoryDeviceFluid SystemPrinciple
Differential pressure (obstruction)VenturimeterPipe (closed conduit)Bernoulli + continuity; pressure drop at throat
Orifice meterPipeBernoulli; sharp-edged orifice plate
Flow nozzlePipeBernoulli; streamlined converging nozzle
Velocity-basedPitot tubePipe or open channelStagnation pressure = static + dynamic pressure
Current meterOpen channel/riverRotating impeller speed ∝ velocity
Hydraulic structures (open channel)Sharp-crested (thin-plate) weirOpen channelBernoulli + integration over flow area
Rectangular notchOpen channelSame as sharp-crested weir
V-notch (triangular)Open channelSame; better sensitivity at low flows
Broad-crested weirOpen channel / irrigation canalCritical flow at weir crest
VolumetricOrifice in tankTank (free outflow)Torricelli’s theorem; Bernoulli from surface to vena contracta

2. Venturimeter — Derivation & Formula

A venturimeter consists of three sections: a converging inlet cone (half-angle ≈ 10°–25°), a cylindrical throat (minimum diameter), and a diverging diffuser (half-angle ≈ 5°–7°, gradual to minimise losses). Pressure tappings at the inlet and throat are connected to a differential manometer.

2.1 Derivation

Apply Bernoulli between inlet (section 1) and throat (section 2), and continuity A₁V₁ = A₂V₂:

Bernoulli (along centreline, no losses for theoretical derivation):

p₁/(ρg) + V₁²/(2g) + z₁ = p₂/(ρg) + V₂²/(2g) + z₂

Define differential head: Δh = (p₁ – p₂)/(ρg) + (z₁ – z₂)

From continuity: V₁ = (A₂/A₁)V₂

Substituting:

Δh = V₂²/(2g) – V₁²/(2g) = (V₂²/2g)[1 – (A₂/A₁)²]

V₂ = √(2gΔh / [1 – (A₂/A₁)²]) = √(2gΔh) × A₁/√(A₁² – A₂²)

Theoretical discharge:

Qth = A₂V₂ = (A₁A₂/√(A₁² – A₂²)) × √(2gΔh)

Actual discharge:

Qact = Cd × (A₁A₂/√(A₁² – A₂²)) × √(2gΔh)

2.2 Differential Head from Manometer

For a differential mercury manometer with deflection x (metres):

Δh = x [(ρmf) – 1]

For mercury–water system: Δh = x (13.6 – 1) = 12.6 x metres of water

For an inverted U-tube (lighter manometric fluid, density ρm < ρf):

Δh = x [1 – (ρmf)]

2.3 Key Values

ParameterTypical ValueReason
Cd (venturimeter)0.96 – 0.99Gradual convergence → low losses; high accuracy
Throat to pipe diameter ratio D₂/D₁0.4 – 0.75Smaller ratio → larger Δh → better sensitivity, but higher permanent pressure loss
Convergent cone angle10°–25° (half-angle)Rapid convergence acceptable as flow accelerates naturally
Divergent cone angle5°–7° (half-angle)Gradual expansion essential to recover pressure (avoid separation)

3. Orifice Meter

An orifice meter is a flat plate with a concentric circular hole (sharp-edged orifice) inserted perpendicular to the pipe axis. The pressure is measured at an upstream tapping (typically D upstream) and at the vena contracta or a downstream tapping (D/2 downstream from the plate — “flange taps” or “corner taps” also used).

Qact = Cd × (A₀A₁/√(A₁² – A₀²)) × √(2gΔh)

where A₀ = area of orifice hole (not pipe area)

Cd ≈ 0.61 – 0.65 for sharp-edged orifice

Cd ≈ 0.98 – 0.99 for rounded/nozzle-type orifice

3.1 Comparison: Venturimeter vs Orifice Meter

FeatureVenturimeterOrifice Meter
Cd0.96–0.99 (high)0.61–0.65 (low)
Permanent pressure loss10–15% of Δp (low)60–70% of Δp (high)
Cost & sizeExpensive, longCheap, compact
AccuracyHighModerate
MaintenanceLow (no moving parts, no sharp edges)Edge dulls over time → Cd changes
Preferred usePermanent installations, clean fluidsTemporary measurement, tight spaces

4. Flow Nozzle

A flow nozzle is an intermediate device — it has a streamlined converging entry like a venturimeter throat but discharges directly into the pipe (no diverging section). This gives higher Cd than an orifice plate (≈ 0.95–0.99) but higher permanent pressure loss than a venturimeter.

Qact = Cd × (A₁A₂/√(A₁² – A₂²)) × √(2gΔh)

Formula identical to venturimeter; only Cd differs (flow nozzle: 0.95–0.99)

DeviceCdPermanent LossCost
Venturimeter0.96–0.99Lowest (~10–15%)Highest
Flow nozzle0.95–0.99Intermediate (~30–50%)Intermediate
Orifice meter0.61–0.65Highest (~60–70%)Lowest

5. Orifice in a Tank — Coefficients Cc, Cv, Cd

When fluid discharges from a small orifice in the wall or base of a tank, three hydraulic coefficients characterise the real-fluid behaviour:

Coefficient of Velocity (Cv):

Cv = Actual jet velocity / Theoretical velocity = Vact / √(2gH)

Accounts for friction losses inside the orifice. Typical value: 0.97–0.99


Coefficient of Contraction (Cc):

Cc = Area of vena contracta / Area of orifice = ac / A₀

Accounts for the inward curvature of streamlines (jet narrows after leaving orifice). Typical value: 0.61–0.64


Coefficient of Discharge (Cd):

Cd = Cv × Cc

Typical value for sharp-edged orifice: 0.61–0.65


Actual discharge:

Q = Cd × A₀ × √(2gH)

5.1 Experimental Determination of Cv

The jet from a horizontal orifice in a tank follows a parabolic trajectory under gravity. If the jet travels a horizontal distance x and falls a vertical distance y from the orifice:

Horizontal: x = Vact × t → t = x/Vact

Vertical (free fall): y = ½gt²

Eliminating t: Vact = x√(g/(2y))

Cv = Vact/√(2gH) = x/(2√(yH))

Cv = x / (2√(yH))

6. Mouthpiece — Types & Discharge

A mouthpiece is a short tube (length ≈ 2–3 times diameter) attached to the orifice opening. It changes the flow pattern and affects the discharge coefficients.

TypeDescriptionCcCvCd
Sharp-edged orificeHole in thin plate; jet contracts to vena contracta0.640.970.62
External cylindrical mouthpieceShort tube projecting outward; full bore flow at exit1.000.820.82
Internal (re-entrant / Borda) mouthpieceShort tube projecting inward into tank0.501.000.50
Convergent mouthpieceTapering outward; jet fills exit; Cd depends on taper angle1.00≈0.95≈0.95
Convergent-divergent mouthpieceConverges to throat then expands; can discharge more than simple orifice for same H1.00≈0.85≈0.85

Key fact for GATE: The external cylindrical mouthpiece has Cd = 0.82 — higher than a sharp-edged orifice (0.62) because the jet completely fills the tube at exit (Cc = 1), even though there are more internal losses (lower Cv). The pressure at the vena contracta inside the mouthpiece drops significantly below atmospheric — the minimum pressure point can be found by applying Bernoulli from tank surface to the internal vena contracta.

7. Notches & Weirs — Open Channel Measurement

A notch is an opening in the side wall of a tank or channel through which flow occurs. A weir is an overflow structure built across a channel to measure or regulate flow. Both work on the same principle: the depth of water above the sill (the crest) is measured, and the discharge is computed from a formula derived by integrating velocity over the flow cross-section using Bernoulli.

7.1 General Derivation Approach

Consider a horizontal strip of width b(y) at height y above the sill, where the total head is H (water depth above sill). The theoretical velocity at that strip (by Bernoulli from the still water upstream):

dQth = b(y) × √(2g(H – y)) × dy

Integrate from y = 0 to y = H

Apply Cd to get actual discharge: Q = Cd × ∫₀ᴴ b(y)√(2g(H–y)) dy

The shape of b(y) (width variation with y) determines whether the result is proportional to H3/2 (rectangular) or H5/2 (triangular).

8. Rectangular Notch & Sharp-Crested Weir

For a rectangular notch of crest length L, the width b(y) = L = constant for all y.

Qth = L × ∫₀ᴴ √(2g(H–y)) dy = L × √(2g) × [–(2/3)(H–y)3/2]₀ᴴ = (2/3)L√(2g) H3/2

Actual discharge (Francis formula):

Q = (2/3) Cd L √(2g) H3/2

where:

  • Cd ≈ 0.611–0.623 for sharp-crested weir
  • L = crest length (m)
  • H = head above crest (m) — measured well upstream of weir

Simplified (with Cd = 0.623 and g = 9.81):

Q = 1.838 L H3/2    (Francis formula, SI units)

8.1 End Contraction Correction (Francis Formula)

When the weir does not span the full channel width, horizontal flow contractions reduce the effective crest length:

Q = 1.838 (L – 0.1nH) H3/2

where n = number of end contractions (n = 2 if both ends are free; n = 1 if one end is against a wall; n = 0 if full channel width)

8.2 Velocity of Approach Correction

If the upstream channel velocity Va is significant, the effective head increases:

Q = (2/3) Cd L √(2g) [(H + Va²/2g)3/2 – (Va²/2g)3/2]

For low approach velocities (Va < 0.3 m/s), the correction is usually negligible.

9. Triangular (V-notch) Weir

For a triangular notch with vertex angle θ (half-angle θ/2), the width at height y above the vertex is:

b(y) = 2y tan(θ/2)

Qth = ∫₀ᴴ 2y tan(θ/2) × √(2g(H–y)) dy = (8/15) tan(θ/2) √(2g) H5/2

Actual discharge:

Q = (8/15) Cd tan(θ/2) √(2g) H5/2

where Cd ≈ 0.60–0.62 for sharp-edged V-notch

For 90° V-notch (θ = 90°, tan 45° = 1):

Q = (8/15) Cd √(2g) H5/2

With Cd = 0.611: Q = 1.417 H5/2 (Thompson’s formula)

9.1 Why Use a V-notch for Low Flows?

Because Q ∝ H5/2 (steeper than H3/2 for rectangular), a small change in H at low flows produces a relatively larger change in Q — making it more sensitive for measuring small discharges. For a rectangular notch at low H, the narrow water section makes the head measurement imprecise. The V-notch’s width reduces to zero at the vertex, so even low heads give a measurable flow width.

FeatureRectangular NotchV-notch (Triangular)
Q ∝H3/2H5/2
Sensitivity at low QLowerHigher
Maximum discharge capacityHigher (wider crest)Lower
Best applicationLarge to medium flowsSmall flows, laboratory
Common θ angle90° (standard), 60°, 45°

10. Trapezoidal Notch — Cipolletti Weir

A trapezoidal notch combines a rectangular base with inclined sides. Its discharge formula is the sum of the rectangular and triangular components:

Q = (2/3) Cd √(2g) L H3/2 + (8/15) Cd √(2g) tan(α) H5/2

where α = side slope angle from vertical (one side)

Cipolletti weir (special trapezoidal): side slopes at 1H:4V (α = 14°2′) chosen so that the triangular component exactly compensates for end contractions in the rectangular part → effective crest length L can be used directly without Francis end contraction correction.

Cipolletti discharge: Q = 1.859 L H3/2

11. Broad-Crested Weir

A broad-crested weir has a horizontal crest wide enough (width > H/2 approximately) that critical flow conditions develop on the crest. This makes the discharge independent of downstream conditions (drowned flow does not occur as easily).

At critical flow on the crest: Vc = √(gyc) and yc = (2/3)H (for rectangular cross-section)

Qth per unit width = Vc × yc = √(g yc) × yc = √g × yc3/2 = √g × [(2/3)H]3/2

Qth = L × √g × (2/3)3/2 × H3/2 = 1.705 L H3/2

Actual discharge: Q = Cd × 1.705 L H3/2

Cd ≈ 0.848 for a well-designed broad-crested weir

Combined: Q ≈ 1.44 L H3/2 (approximate for field use)

11.1 Sharp-Crested vs Broad-Crested Weir

FeatureSharp-Crested (Thin-plate)Broad-Crested
Crest width< H/2 (thin)> H/2 (wide)
Q formula coefficient1.838 (Francis)1.44 (typical)
Flow regime at crestOverfall (nappe) — subcritical to free overfallCritical flow develops on crest
Drowned flow susceptibilityMore susceptibleSelf-modulating (less susceptible)
AccuracyHigher (laboratory standard)Good for field use
Typical applicationLab, precision gauging stationsIrrigation canals, field measurement

12. Worked Examples (GATE CE Level)

Example 1 — Rectangular Notch Discharge with End Contractions (GATE CE type)

Problem: A rectangular notch 1.2 m long has a head of 0.45 m over it. Cd = 0.623. There are two end contractions. Find the actual discharge using the Francis formula.

Given:
L = 1.2 m; H = 0.45 m; Cd = 0.623; n = 2 (two end contractions)

Effective length (Francis end contraction correction):

Leff = L – 0.1 × n × H = 1.2 – 0.1 × 2 × 0.45 = 1.2 – 0.09 = 1.11 m

Discharge (Francis formula):

Q = 1.838 × Leff × H3/2

H3/2 = (0.45)1.5 = 0.45 × √0.45 = 0.45 × 0.6708 = 0.3019 m3/2

Q = 1.838 × 1.11 × 0.3019 = 1.838 × 0.3351 = 0.6159 m³/s

Answer: Q = 0.616 m³/s

Example 2 — 90° V-notch Discharge (GATE CE 2019 type)

Problem: A 90° triangular notch has a head of 0.30 m over its crest. Cd = 0.62. Calculate the discharge.

Given:
θ = 90° → tan(θ/2) = tan 45° = 1
H = 0.30 m; Cd = 0.62

V-notch discharge formula:

Q = (8/15) × Cd × tan(θ/2) × √(2g) × H5/2

= (8/15) × 0.62 × 1 × √(2 × 9.81) × (0.30)5/2

√(2 × 9.81) = √19.62 = 4.429 m1/2/s

(0.30)5/2 = (0.30)² × (0.30)0.5 = 0.09 × 0.5477 = 0.04929 m5/2

Q = (8/15) × 0.62 × 4.429 × 0.04929

= 0.5333 × 0.62 × 4.429 × 0.04929

= 0.5333 × 0.1352 = 0.07210 m³/s = 72.1 L/s

Answer: Q = 72.1 litres/s

Example 3 — Orifice Meter vs Venturimeter (Conceptual + Numerical)

Problem: Two flow meters are installed in a 200 mm pipe carrying water. A venturimeter (Cd = 0.98, throat D = 100 mm) and an orifice meter (Cd = 0.62, orifice D = 100 mm) both show the same manometer deflection x = 50 mm of mercury. Find the ratio of discharges Qventuri/Qorifice.

Both devices: same A₁, same A₂ (same pipe and throat/orifice diameters), same Δh

Δh = 12.6 × 0.05 = 0.63 m of water (same for both)

Q = Cd × (A₁A₂/√(A₁² – A₂²)) × √(2gΔh)

Since the geometric term and √(2gΔh) are identical for both:

Qventuri/Qorifice = Cd,venturi / Cd,orifice = 0.98 / 0.62 = 1.581

The venturimeter delivers 58.1% more measured discharge than the orifice meter for the same manometer reading — because its Cd is higher (less energy loss).

Answer: Qventuri/Qorifice = 1.58

Example 4 — Coefficient of Velocity from Jet Trajectory

Problem: Water issues from a sharp-edged orifice in the vertical side of a tank under a head of 1.2 m. The jet travels horizontally 2.1 m and falls 0.75 m vertically below the orifice centre. Calculate Cv.

Given:
H = 1.2 m; x = 2.1 m; y = 0.75 m

Formula:

Cv = x / (2√(yH)) = 2.1 / (2 × √(0.75 × 1.2))

= 2.1 / (2 × √0.90)

= 2.1 / (2 × 0.9487)

= 2.1 / 1.8974 = 1.107

Cv > 1 is not physically possible — re-check: the formula is Cv = x/(2√(yH)).
√(0.75 × 1.2) = √0.9 = 0.9487; 2 × 0.9487 = 1.8974; 2.1/1.8974 = 1.107.

This indicates either the given data contains measurement error or the jet has additional pressure driving it. For a GATE-style exact problem, verify with consistent data:

If x = 1.9 m (revised): Cv = 1.9/1.8974 = 1.001 ≈ 1.00 (theoretical, frictionless jet)

If x = 1.8 m: Cv = 1.8/1.8974 = 0.949 (realistic sharp-edged orifice)

General formula to use in GATE: Cv = x / (2√(yH))

Answer: Cv = x / (2√(yH)) — apply with given data. Typical value ≈ 0.97–0.99 for sharp orifice.

Example 5 — Broad-Crested Weir Discharge

Problem: A broad-crested weir 3.5 m long has a head of 0.6 m over it. Cd = 0.848. Find the discharge.

Given:
L = 3.5 m; H = 0.6 m; Cd = 0.848

Q = Cd × 1.705 × L × H3/2

H3/2 = (0.6)1.5 = 0.6 × √0.6 = 0.6 × 0.7746 = 0.4648 m3/2

Q = 0.848 × 1.705 × 3.5 × 0.4648

= 0.848 × 1.705 × 1.6268

= 0.848 × 2.774 = 2.352 m³/s

Answer: Q = 2.35 m³/s

Example 6 — Comparison of Rectangular and V-notch at Same Head (GATE MCQ type)

Problem: A rectangular notch (L = 0.5 m, Cd = 0.62) and a 90° V-notch (Cd = 0.62) are each used to measure flow with H = 0.25 m. Which gives greater discharge?

Rectangular:

Qrect = (2/3) × 0.62 × 0.5 × √(2×9.81) × (0.25)3/2

= 0.4133 × 0.5 × 4.429 × 0.125

= 0.4133 × 0.2768 = 0.1144 m³/s

90° V-notch:

QV = (8/15) × 0.62 × 1 × 4.429 × (0.25)5/2

(0.25)5/2 = (0.25)² × √0.25 = 0.0625 × 0.5 = 0.03125 m5/2

= 0.5333 × 0.62 × 4.429 × 0.03125

= 0.5333 × 0.08583 = 0.04577 m³/s

Qrect = 0.1144 m³/s > QV = 0.04577 m³/s

Answer: Rectangular notch gives greater discharge (0.114 m³/s vs 0.046 m³/s) at H = 0.25 m.

13. Common Mistakes

Mistake 1 — Using H3/2 Instead of H5/2 for V-notch

Error: Applying Q = (2/3)CdL√(2g)H3/2 (rectangular formula) to a triangular notch.
Root Cause: Both formulas look similar; the exponent (3/2 vs 5/2) is easily confused under exam pressure.
Fix: Derive both mentally from the integration: rectangular → width is constant → one extra integration step → H3/2. Triangular → width increases linearly with depth → two extra integration steps → H5/2. Always write the shape first, then choose the formula.

Mistake 2 — Using Area of Pipe Instead of Area of Orifice in the Orifice Meter Formula

Error: Substituting A₁ (pipe area) for A₀ (orifice area) in Q = Cd(A₁A₀/√(A₁²–A₀²))√(2gΔh).
Root Cause: In a venturimeter, A₂ = throat area. In an orifice meter, A₀ = orifice hole area — not the pipe cross-section. They are named differently for a reason.
Fix: For orifice meter: A₀ = π Dorifice²/4; for venturimeter: A₂ = π Dthroat²/4. In both cases, A₁ = pipe area at inlet section. Never mix these up.

Mistake 3 — Ignoring End Contractions in Rectangular Notch Problems

Error: Using the full crest length L without applying the Francis end contraction correction (L – 0.1nH) when end contractions are present.
Root Cause: Students skip the correction either because they forget it or because they are unsure whether n = 1 or 2. The problem statement usually specifies “end contractions present” or the geometry (weir against one wall vs freestanding) makes it clear.
Fix: n = 2 if the weir is narrower than the channel and both sides are free; n = 1 if one side is flush with the channel wall; n = 0 if the weir spans the full channel width (suppressed end contractions).

Mistake 4 — Forgetting the Cd = Cv × Cc Relationship for Orifice

Error: Given Cv and Cc, computing discharge as Q = Cv × A₀ × √(2gH) without multiplying by Cc.
Root Cause: The jet velocity is Cv√(2gH), but the jet cross-sectional area is CcA₀ (not A₀). Discharge = area × velocity = CcA₀ × Cv√(2gH) = CdA₀√(2gH).
Fix: Always compute Cd = Cv × Cc first, then use Q = Cd A₀ √(2gH).

Mistake 5 — Confusing Head H in Weir Formulas (Using Total Water Depth Instead of Depth Above Crest)

Error: Using total channel depth d as H in the weir formula instead of the head above the weir crest (H = d – P, where P = height of weir sill above channel bed).
Root Cause: Misreading the problem or not drawing a clear diagram. H in all weir formulas is always measured from the weir crest (sill) to the upstream free surface — not from the channel bed.
Fix: Always draw a sketch showing the channel bed, the weir crest height P, and the water surface. H = total depth – sill height = d – P.

14. Frequently Asked Questions

Q1. Why is Cd of an orifice meter much lower than that of a venturimeter?

The coefficient of discharge Cd accounts for two effects: velocity losses (Cv) and contraction of the jet (Cc). For a venturimeter, the gradual converging profile guides the flow smoothly to the throat without separation, so Cv ≈ 0.995–0.999 and Cc = 1.0 (full bore at throat) → Cd ≈ 0.96–0.99. For a sharp-edged orifice plate, the flow contracts sharply to a vena contracta downstream of the plate (Cc ≈ 0.61–0.64), and the abrupt geometry creates turbulent mixing and energy loss (Cv ≈ 0.97–0.99). The product Cv × Cc ≈ 0.62 gives the low Cd. In practice, this means an orifice meter with a given manometer reading actually discharges much less fluid than a venturimeter with the same reading — a venturimeter more efficiently converts pressure energy to kinetic energy at the throat.

Q2. What is vena contracta and why does it occur?

The vena contracta is the minimum cross-section of a fluid jet issuing from an orifice, located a short distance downstream of the orifice opening. It occurs because the fluid streamlines approaching the orifice converge not just radially but also axially — streamlines from the sides of the tank have inward momentum that continues past the orifice plane. This causes the jet to narrow further before the streamlines become parallel. At the vena contracta, the streamlines are parallel and the pressure equals atmospheric. The coefficient of contraction Cc = Avena contracta/Aorifice ≈ 0.61–0.64 for a sharp-edged orifice, meaning the jet cross-section is about 61–64% of the orifice area at the vena contracta. A rounded (bell-mouthed) orifice eliminates contraction because the streamlines are guided smoothly → Cc = 1.0 and Cd ≈ Cv.

Q3. How does the approach velocity affect weir discharge measurement?

Standard weir formulas assume the upstream velocity is negligible (Va ≈ 0), which is valid when the weir is installed in a large channel or tank with a large cross-sectional area relative to the weir opening. When the approach channel is narrow (approach velocity Va is significant), the kinetic energy of the incoming flow adds to the effective head over the weir. The corrected head becomes Heff = H + Va²/(2g), and the discharge formula becomes Q = (2/3)CdL√(2g)[(H + ha)3/2 – ha3/2] where ha = Va²/(2g). For Va < 0.3 m/s, the correction is typically less than 1% and can be neglected. In irrigation canal measurement (where IS 6966 applies), approach velocity corrections are specified when the velocity exceeds threshold values.

Q4. When should a V-notch be preferred over a rectangular notch for flow measurement?

A V-notch should be chosen when the flow range is small or highly variable, and accuracy at low flows is important. Because Q ∝ H5/2 for a V-notch (vs H3/2 for a rectangular notch), the V-notch produces a larger relative change in H for a given change in Q at low flows — making it easier to measure accurately with a staff gauge or water level sensor. For example, a V-notch that passes 5 L/s at H = 0.10 m will only pass 28 L/s at H = 0.20 m — a doubling of H gives a 5.66× increase in Q (25/2 = 5.66). The V-notch is also self-cleaning to some extent (no horizontal sill to trap sediment). Its limitation is low capacity — at high heads, a wide V-notch becomes unwieldy and a rectangular weir or broad-crested weir is preferred for large irrigation or spillway discharges.